• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

The Mental Health Recovery Archive, The Wellcome Trust – review of its ‘soft launch’ (9 December 2013)

posted on February 24, 2025

Research Summary: Mental Health Recovery Archive

Topic: Participatory archive of mental health recovery narratives and lived experience expertise
Institution: The Wellcome Trust, initiated by Ph.D. researcher Anna Sexton and Professor Jerome Carson
Key Contributors: Peter Bullimore (Paranoia Network founder), Stuart Baker-Brown (schizophrenia recovery), Dolly Sen (author, recovery through meaning-making), Andrew Voyce (schizophrenia and homelessness recovery)
Archive Aims: Recover and redefine the term ‘recovery' by centering individuals with lived experience as professional experts rather than diagnostic categories
Core Findings: Recovery is individualized and self-directed; disclosure of trauma is critical (average 16-year delay); community care, therapeutic medication, and personal meaning-making facilitate recovery trajectories
Conceptual Framework: Recovery operates through emotional, spiritual, and social pathways rather than medical models alone; stigma reduction and individual agency are essential
Research Significance: Qualitative, humanities-informed archival approach that privileges personal narrative over clinical categorization in understanding mental health recovery

Roz Oates, a doctoral student in Durham’s Centre for Medical Humanities and Department of Geography, who is also part of the Hearing the Voice research team, writes:

The Mental Health Recovery Archive at the Wellcome Trust

On Monday 9 December, I attended a Mental Health Recovery Symposium at the Wellcome Trust in London. This event was organised by Anna Sexton, a Ph.D. researcher and archivist, and Professor Jerome Carson, and marked the soft launch of the recovery archive on the omega system that Anna initiated in the context of her doctoral research on ‘participatory archives’.

Anna Sexton started off by presenting the four moving and powerful stories of recovery from the recovery archive that she has created. Anna hoped that the individuals with lived experience who have provided these narratives would be regarded as professional experts. The aim of the archive is to recover and redefine the term ‘recovery’.

One of the contributors to the archive, Peter Bullimore, drawing on his personal experience of trauma, proposed that trauma often plays an important role in mental health problems. Peter is the founder of the Paranoia Network, and encourages mental health professionals to reach beyond diagnostic labels to help the individual with their recovery. Peter mentioned that it takes on average sixteen years for people with mental health problems to disclose abuse. But disclosure is important, otherwise ‘frozen fear’ can stop emotional development, preventing the person from feeling that they have control in their life.

A short film was shown featuring the recovery of Stuart Baker-Brown from schizophrenia. Inspired by John Nash’s film, ‘A Beautiful Mind’, Stuart was awarded a William Churchill Memorial Trust fellowship, and fulfilled a dream of hiking in the Himalayas and doing photography. He believes that recovery is ‘something the person has to work out for themselves’, but that it is important not to ‘bow down to stigma and discrimination’.

Dolly Sen, whose story also appears in the archive, spoke of the importance of laughter in her recovery. She is the author of numerous books, including ‘The World is Full of Laughter’. She believes that it is important that the story of recovery is one’s own. She reflected how in twenty-five years of psychiatric care, nobody asked her about her story. Yet, ‘finding the dolliness of Dolly is not a medical phenomenon’, she said, ‘it’s an emotional and spiritual one’. Dolly hopes that the mental health recovery model will revise and rewrite itself, and challenge the fear around mental health.

The fourth contributor to the archive, Andrew Voyce, spoke about his recovery from schizophrenia. After becoming unwell at university, he spent a long period homeless. Andrew feels that he was saved by the introduction of community care and the closure of the asylums. Instead of ‘mindbending injections’, he was finally given ‘satisfactory therapeutic medication’. Andrew believes that recovery ‘is not about a cure, but taking steps to becoming yourself again’. He named individuals who are important recovery heroes for him, and these include the psychologists Peter Chadwick and Patricia Deegan. Andrew is most happy to regain his intellectual functioning, and he is the author of ‘The Durham Light and Other Stories’.

The afternoon closed with Professor Jerome Carson speaking of how there is a continuing need for experiences of recovery from mental health problems to be shared by mental health professionals and service-users. He believes that a more positive image of psychosis is needed, and showed short films of Master’s students speaking of how they were inspired and impressed by the recovery stories in the archive. The archive is now live.

Related Articles

  • Nootropic Supplement Safety Guide 2026: Who Should Be Cautio…
  • Nootropic Ingredients Research 2026: What Studies Actually S…
  • How Cognitive Function Changes With Age: 2026 Overview
  • Empathy and memory in theology and literature! (Affiliates’…

Filed Under: Uncategorized

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy