• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

Tangentially Queer: A Workshop on the Field Formation of Queer Theory (CfP, London,May 2014)

posted on March 22, 2025

Research Summary: Tangentially Queer Workshop

Event Type: Academic workshop on queer theory field formation
Location & Date: London School of Economics, May 16, 2014
Core Inquiry: Examination of queer theory's institutionalization within Anglo-American academy and its relationship to knowledge production economies
Primary Themes: Field-formational subjects/objects, anti-racist critique, transnational frameworks, academic disciplinarity, queer temporalities, intersectionality
Methodological Approach: Critical interrogation of queer theory's canonical texts, prioritized subjects (gay/lesbian lives, Butler, Sedgwick), and institutional attachments
Key Questions: How does marketization affect queer theory's visibility and normalization; what objects/narratives are deemed vital versus tangential to queerness projects
Format: One-day workshop accepting 20-minute papers across specified research domains

Tangentially Queer
London School of Economics
16th May, 2014

Tangentially Queer seeks to explore the contemporary terrains of queer theorising, and its trajectories, histories, and field imaginaries. Throughout its academic history, “queer” has often been left undefined, a theoretical concept without fixed referent. This lack of definition is often attributed to the usefulness of “queer” as an elusive concept. Yet, against this undefinable ambition, contemporary queer theory tends to orientate itself around particular subjects and objects: it is common to hear reference to gay and lesbian lives, Butler and Sedgwick as canonical texts, and claims to deterritorialization and anti-normativity, for example. Despite the propagation of queer being undefiniable and infinitely useful, queer theory’s prioritized subjects and objects have become especially frequent and institutionalized within the Anglo-American academy.

Rather than take queer theory’s institutional status and object-attachments for granted, this one-day workshop asks that we situate the institutional life of queer theory within the broader contemporary context of the political economy of knowledge production. We ask, for example: within an increasingly marketized academic environment, how might queer theory’s field formation relate to the visibility, normalization, and legitimation of certain queer lives? Under what auspices of criticality, with which cultural texts, theoretical practices, forms of pedagogy, and methodological tendencies has the study of queerness been institutionalized? How might we think of the relations between queer theory’s increasing academic disciplinarity, its prevalent subjects and objects, and the broader drive for academic impact and political utility?

This one day workshop hopes to offer a space for a discussion of the contemporary landscape of queer theory by inquiring into how queerness has been taken up as field-formational, and what objects, narratives, methodologies, histories, and temporalities, are deemed vital to, tangential to, or separate from, the project of queerness. In doing so, Tangentially Queer hopes to explore and intervene in our investments in queer critique, attempting to realign them so as to consider different ways of thinking, doing, and being queer.

In exploring the topics of queerness, queer theory, and its trajectories and field imaginaries, and in conversation with the above, we invite proposals for 20 minute papers which might address, but are not limited to, the following themes:

  • “Proper” queer objects and subjects
  • The position, relevance, and necessity for anti-racist critique within queer theory
  • Transnational queer theories
  • Queer theory’s political agenda(s)
  • Queer times and generations
  • Queer theory’s relationship to lesbian and gay studies
  • Queer theory’s relationship to feminisms
  • Definitions of “queerness”
  • Queer theory’s relationship to academic institutions
  • Queer memories, histories, and archives
  • Queer theory and intersectional analysis
  • Alternative queer academic futures
  • Political economies of queer knowledge production

Please submit paper abstracts of 300-500 words along with a short biography of 150 words to: [email protected] by Friday 14 March. Click here for more information.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy