• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

Reviewer needed: ‘The Good Death: An Exploration of Dying in America’ by Ann Neumann

posted on February 3, 2025

Research Summary: The Good Death: An Exploration of Dying in America

Category: Medical humanities; end-of-life care exploration
Author & Publisher: Ann Neumann; Beacon Press, 2016
Primary Focus: Examines definitions and experiences of “good death” in contemporary American medical, legal, religious, and social contexts
Research Methods: Journalist-led qualitative study combining hospice volunteer experience, interviews, conference attendance, and stakeholder narratives across multiple perspectives
Key Finding: “Good death” is multifactorial and contested, shaped by age, race, economic status, culture, beliefs, and competing concepts of autonomy, choice, and consent across medical, legal, and religious systems
Evidence Grade: Qualitative humanities-based investigation integrating lived experience with policy and institutional analysis
Target Audience: Medical humanities scholars, clinicians, bioethicists, grief professionals, and those engaged with end-of-life care
Review Submission: Expressions of interest welcome; maximum 1,000 words; consult reviewer guidelines before inquiry

We are pleased to offer for review ‘The Good Death: An Exploration of Dying in America’ by Ann Neumann (Beacon Press, 2016). Expressions of interest are welcome from across the medical humanities.

Following the death of her father, journalist and hospice volunteer Ann Neumann sets out to examine what it means to die well in the United States.

When Ann Neumann’s father was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, she left her job and moved back to her hometown of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. She became his full-time caregiver—cooking, cleaning, and administering medications. When her father died, she was undone by the experience, by grief and the visceral quality of dying. Neumann struggled to put her life back in order and found herself haunted by a question: Was her father’s death a good death?

The way we talk about dying and the way we actually die are two very different things, she discovered, and many of us are shielded from what death actually looks like. To gain a better understanding, Neumann became a hospice volunteer and set out to discover what a good death is today. She attended conferences, academic lectures, and grief sessions in church basements. She went to Montana to talk with the attorney who successfully argued for the legalization of aid in dying, and to Scranton, Pennsylvania, to listen to “pro-life” groups who believe the removal of feeding tubes from some patients is tantamount to murder. Above all, she listened to the stories of those who were close to death.

What Neumann found is that death in contemporary America is much more complicated than we think. Medical technologies and increased life expectancies have changed the very definition of medical death. And although death is our common fate, it is also a divisive issue that we all experience differently. What constitutes a good death is unique to each of us, depending on our age, race, economic status, culture, and beliefs. What’s more, differing concepts of choice, autonomy, and consent make death a contested landscape, governed by social, medical, legal, and religious systems.

In these pages, Neumann brings us intimate portraits of the nurses, patients, bishops, bioethicists, and activists who are shaping the way we die. The Good Death presents a fearless examination of how we approach death, and how those of us close to dying loved ones live in death’s wake.

If you would like to review ‘The Good Death’ (no more than 1,000 words in length), then please consult our reviewer’s guidelines and email our reviews editor with a short explanation of why you are well placed to review the book.

Filed Under: Call For Reviews

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy