• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

Reviewer needed: ‘Ordinary Medicine: Extraordinary treatments, longer lives, and where to draw the line’ by Sharon R. Kaufman

posted on January 3, 2025

Research Summary: Ordinary Medicine by Sharon R. Kaufman

Topic: Medical humanities analysis of modern medical overtreatment and end-of-life decision-making
Author/Institution: Sharon R. Kaufman; Duke University Press, 2015
Key Themes: Pharmaceutical industry influence, bureaucratic healthcare systems, aging and medical intervention, pharmaceutical-biomedical-insurance nexus
Evidence Grade: Qualitative scholarship grounded in 13+ years of ethnographic research with older patients, physicians, and families (2002 onwards)
Primary Argument: Social, economic, and bureaucratic forces have normalized extraordinary treatments, obscuring the clinical and ethical boundary between adequate and excessive medical intervention
Clinical Application: Offers framework for rethinking healthcare goals and supporting informed decision-making at the line between life-extending therapy and medical overtreatment in aging populations
Target Audience: Medical humanities scholars, clinicians, geriatricians, bioethicists, and healthcare policy professionals

We are pleased to offer for review ‘Ordinary Medicine’ by Sharon R. Kaufman (Duke University Press, 2015). Expressions of interest are welcome from across the medical humanities.

Most of us want and expect medicine’s miracles to extend our lives. In today’s aging society, however, the line between life-giving therapies and too much treatment is hard to see—it’s being obscured by a perfect storm created by the pharmaceutical and biomedical industries, along with insurance companies.

In Ordinary Medicine Sharon R. Kaufman investigates what drives that storm’s “more is better” approach to medicine: a nearly invisible chain of social, economic, and bureaucratic forces that has made once-extraordinary treatments seem ordinary, necessary, and desirable. Since 2002 Kaufman has listened to hundreds of older patients, their physicians and family members express their hopes, fears, and reasoning as they faced the line between enough and too much intervention. Their stories anchor Ordinary Medicine.

Today’s medicine, Kaufman contends, shapes nearly every American’s experience of growing older, and ultimately medicine is undermining its own ability to function as a social good. Kaufman’s careful mapping of the sources of our health care dilemmas should make it far easier to rethink and renew medicine’s goals.

If you would like to write a review on ‘Ordinary Medicine’ (no more than 1,000 words in length), then please consult our reviewer’s guidelines and email our reviews editor with a short explanation of why you are well placed to review the book.

Related Articles

  • ‘Recovery’ in mental health: who judges, on what grounds, wi…
  • Industriousness and Daydreaming: Cognitive Neuroscience’s Re…
  • Nootropic Supplement Safety Guide 2026: Who Should Be Cautio…
  • Nootropic Ingredients Research 2026: What Studies Actually S…

Filed Under: Call For Reviews

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy