• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

Reviewer needed: ‘On Flinching: Theatricality and Scientific Looking from Darwin to Shell Shock’ by Tiffany Watt Smith

posted on January 14, 2025

Research Summary: On Flinching: Theatricality and Scientific Looking from Darwin to Shell Shock

Category: Medical Humanities Scholarly Monograph
Publisher & Date: Oxford University Press, 2014
Author: Tiffany Watt Smith
Primary Focus: Explores emotional and theatrical dimensions of scientific observation in late 19th and early 20th-century laboratory and clinical settings.
Key Subjects Examined: Experiments by Charles Darwin (naturalist), David Ferrier (physiologist), Henry Head (neurologist), and Arthur Hurst (psychologist).
Central Argument: Scientific observers' involuntary emotional responses—flinching, wincing, recoiling—reveal that passionate, gestured looking persisted even during the rise of laboratory objectivity, paralleling theatrical spectatorship conventions of the period.
Disciplinary Relevance: Medical humanities, English literature, theatre studies, history of emotions and sensations.
Review Status: Reviewer solicitation open; approximately 1,000–1,500 word review requested.

A reviewer is needed for ‘On Flinching’ (Oxford University Press, 2014) by Tiffany Watt Smith. Expressions of interest are welcome from across the medical humanities and may be of particular interest to readers with an interest in English literature, theatre studies, and the history of the emotions and sensations.

‘While the end of the nineteenth century is often associated with the rise of objectivity and its ideal of a restrained observer, scientific experiments continued to create emotional, even theatrical, relationships between scientist and his subject. On Flinching focuses on moments in which scientific observers flinched from sudden noises, winced at the sight of an animal’s pain or cringed when he was caught looking, as ways to consider a distinctive motif of passionate and gestured looking in the laboratory and beyond. It was not their laboratory machines who these scientific observers most closely resembled, but the self-consciously emotional theatrical audiences of the period.

Tiffany Watt-Smith offers close readings of four experiments performed by the naturalist Charles Darwin, the physiologist David Ferrier, the neurologist Henry Head, and the psychologist Arthur Hurst. Bringing together flinching scientific observers with actors and spectators in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century theatre, it places the history of scientific looking in its wider cultural context, arguing that even at the dawn of objectivity the techniques and problems of the stage continued to haunt scientific life. In turn, it suggests that by exploring the ways recoiling, shrinking and wincing becoming paradigmatic spectatorial gestures in this period, we can understand the ways Victorians thought about looking as itself an emotional and gestured performance.’

If you would like to review ‘On Flinching’ (approximately 1,000-1,500 words in length), then please email our reviews editor with a short explanation of why you are well placed to review the book.

Related Articles

  • ‘Recovery’ in mental health: who judges, on what grounds, wi…
  • Industriousness and Daydreaming: Cognitive Neuroscience’s Re…
  • Nootropic Supplement Safety Guide 2026: Who Should Be Cautio…
  • Nootropic Ingredients Research 2026: What Studies Actually S…

Filed Under: Call For Reviews

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy