This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making health decisions based on this content. Centre For Medical Humanities may contain affiliate links — purchases through these links support our editorial work at no extra cost to you.
By CentreForMedicalHumanities.org Research Team | Last verified: September 2026
Elaine P. Miller’s fascinating book ‘Head Cases: Julia Kristeva’ on Philosophy and Art in Depressed Time’ (Columbia University Press, 2014) is available for review and expressions of interest are welcome from across the medical humanities, especially from candidates who are familiar with Kristeva’s work.
‘While philosophy and psychoanalysis privilege language and conceptual distinctions and mistrust the image, the philosopher and psychoanalyst Julia Kristeva recognizes the power of art and the imagination to unblock important sources of meaning. She also appreciates the process through which creative acts counteract and transform feelings of violence and depression.
Reviewing Kristeva’s corpus, Elaine P. Miller considers the intellectual’s “aesthetic idea” and “thought specular” in their capacity to reshape depressive thought on both the individual and cultural level. She revisits Kristeva’s reading of Walter Benjamin with reference to melancholic art and the imagination’s allegorical structure; her analysis of Byzantine iconoclasm in relation to Freud’s psychoanalytic theory of negation and Hegel’s dialectical negativity; her understanding of Proust as an exemplary practitioner of sublimation; her rereading of Kant and Arendt in terms of art as an intentional lingering with foreignness; and her argument that forgiveness is both a philosophical and psychoanalytic method of transcending a “stuck” existence. Focusing on specific artworks that illustrate Kristeva’s ideas, from ancient Greek tragedy to early photography, contemporary installation art, and film, Miller positions creative acts as a form of “spiritual inoculation” against the violence of our society and its discouragement of thought and reflection’.
If you would like to write a review on ‘Head Cases’ (approximately 1,000-1,500 words maximum in length), then please email our reviews editor with a short explanation of why you are well placed to review the book.
Related Articles
- ‘Recovery’ in mental health: who judges, on what grounds, wi…
- Industriousness and Daydreaming: Cognitive Neuroscience’s Re…
- Nootropic Supplement Safety Guide 2026: Who Should Be Cautio…
- Nootropic Ingredients Research 2026: What Studies Actually S…
FDA Disclaimer: These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.