• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

Review of the First Medical Humanities Research Network Scotland Symposium 2012

posted on March 7, 2025

Research Summary: Medical Humanities Research Network Scotland Symposium 2012

Event Type: Academic symposium on medical humanities research
Location & Date: School of Critical Studies, University of Glasgow, 2012
Key Organizers: Gavin Miller, David Shuttleton, Megan Coyer
Central Themes: “Why Historicise?” and “Theory into Practice”
Core Topics Covered: History of psychiatry, psychopathic personality, animal medicine, addictions, clinical judgment, patient engagement, medical ethics
Notable Speakers: Allan Beveridge (psychiatrist/historian), John Callender, Matthew Smith, Andrew Gardiner, Iain Smith, Jane Macnaughton, Desmond Ryan, Tim Thornton
Scholarly Focus: Interdisciplinary dialogue bridging medical humanities, history, ethics, and clinical practice to challenge contemporary medical understanding
Significance: Established foundation for ongoing Medical Humanities Research Network Scotland events and continued scholarly discourse

Cheryl McGeachan writes: The first Medical Humanities Research Network Scotland (MHRNS) Symposium took place last month in the School of Critical Studies, University of Glasgow. Co-ordinated by Gavin Miller, David Shuttleton and Megan Coyer, the event consisted of a number of diverse, challenging and personal pieces based around the themes “Why Historicise?” and “Theory into Practice”.

Psychiatrist and Historian of Medicine Allan Beveridge opened the morning proceedings with a fantastically enlightening account of his personal journey through the histories of psychiatry. John Callender’s paper then turned to opening up disturbingly challenging debates over the psychopathic personality, bringing to light the personal and political dimensions to ordering personality types. Matthew Smith’s humorous, yet, poignant piece reflected the challenges of communicating across the medical humanities and health care professions. Andrew Gardiner then changed tact to ask the audience to think about the history of animal medicine, raising important questions about the nature of animal agency. Finally, Iain Smith closed the morning proceedings with a captivating glimpse into the histories of addictions, posing questions about the importance of historicising such issues in contemporary times.

Afternoon events were equally thought-provoking with papers such as Jane Macnaughton’s “Risking Enchantment: how are we to view the smoking person”, Desmond Ryan’s “From the ‘therapy of the word’ to ‘concordance’: is the freedom of the patient the basis of the humanity of the doctor?” and Tim Thornton’s “Clinical Judgement and the Medical Humanities”, all instigating discussion into the notion of engagement and opening up insights into the place of the medical humanities in these debates.

The event brought together a diverse range of people and ideas that challenged, inspired and provoked further discussion which we all hope to continue in the MHRNS events that are still to come.

Related Articles

  • Nootropic Supplement Safety Guide 2026: Who Should Be Cautio…
  • Nootropic Ingredients Research 2026: What Studies Actually S…
  • How Cognitive Function Changes With Age: 2026 Overview
  • Empathy and memory in theology and literature! (Affiliates’…

Filed Under: Conference Review

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy