• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

Music, Emotions and Well-being: historical and scientific perspectives (Conference, London, 20 June 2014)

posted on March 13, 2025

Research Summary: Music, Emotions and Well-being Conference

Event Type: International interdisciplinary research symposium
Date & Location: 20 June 2014, Robin Brook Centre, Queen Mary University of London
Organizers: Penelope Gouk (Manchester), James Kennaway (Newcastle), Jacomien Prins (Warwick), Wiebke Thormählen (Royal College of Music)
Primary Focus: Integration of historical and scientific perspectives on music's emotional and physiological effects on well-being
Disciplinary Scope: Neurology, cognitive psychology, music therapy, history, musicology, and medical humanities
Central Research Question: How to merge culturally-contingent historical understandings with universal neurobiological findings regarding music's emotional impact
Key Objective: Develop integrated research strategies that incorporate cultural conditioning into scientific methodologies while advancing medical humanities inquiry
Methodology: Symposium based on pre-circulated papers to maximize interdisciplinary discussion and evidence synthesis

Music, Emotions and Well-being: historical and scientific perspectives

International Conference, 20 June 2014,

Robin Brook Centre, Queen Mary University of London

Organised by Penelope Gouk (Manchester), James Kennaway (Newcastle),

Jacomien Prins (Warwick), and Wiebke Thormählen (Royal College of Music)

Music is commonly treated as an emotional stimulant that can calm, console or energise. That music can and frequently does contribute to an individual’s sense of well-being is commonly accepted. This relationship between music, the emotions and well-being has been studied from two different perspectives. It has been the subject of historical investigations problematizing what emotions are and exploring historically variant practices of using music as an emotional tool. Secondly, studies by psychologists and, increasingly, by neurologists have produced exciting results by measuring music’s effect on the emotions in physiological terms that appear universal and a-historical. We aim to bring these two seemingly incompatible views of music’s emotional effects together to search for research strategies that can incorporate ideas of cultural conditioning into scientific research methods. As such, the symposium addresses both the role and potential of music in well-being, but it also raises the bar for medical humanities by investigating how its research areas can impact on research questions and strategies beyond the humanities. Delegates will present their views from the fields of neurology, cognitive psychology, music therapy, history and musicology. The symposium will be based on pre-circulated papers to allow maximum discussion time.

Aims

In this interdisciplinary research symposium we will bring together historians, musicologists, psychologists, music therapists, and neuroscientists, to look beyond influential yet often un-theorized views of music and ‘emotion’ to explore how music can function as a strategic tool in establishing individual well-being. The relationship between music, the body and the nervous system is the subject of intense interest both in a medical context and in the humanities. While neurologists have researched the impact of music on the brain, musicologists have rediscovered the significance of music’s physical effects in historical and present-day contexts.

These investigations into music’s relationship with emotions and with well-being fall broadly into two categories: scientific understandings of music’s emotional effects commonly take both music and emotions as unproblematic, universal categories; while historical approaches show these categories to be culturally contingent. This duality is entrenched in different methodological approaches which appear to necessitate the duality, yet at the heart of the opposition lies a fundamental discrepancy between different disciplinary groups’ modes of understanding data.

We aim to question the duality’s necessity and explore new ways to merge research questions by investigating how postmodern theories of social and historical conditioning can influence the formulation of scientific research questions. Through this symposium we aim to further an understanding of each field’s research questions and methods, and to explore new collaborative projects.

For further information, including the exact London location, please visit our conference website.

Share this:

  • Share
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related Articles

  • Industriousness and Daydreaming: Cognitive Neuroscience’s Re…
  • Nootropic Supplement Safety Guide 2026: Who Should Be Cautio…
  • Nootropic Ingredients Research 2026: What Studies Actually S…
  • How Cognitive Function Changes With Age: 2026 Overview

Filed Under: Conferences

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy