• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

Longing for Sleep: Assessing the Place of Sleep in the 21st Century (Somatosphere Interview)

posted on March 3, 2025

Research Summary: Social Studies of Sleep in the 21st Century

Topic: Interdisciplinary academic field examining sleep as social, cultural, and medical phenomenon
Key Research Areas: Medical anthropology, science and technology studies, cultural psychiatry, bioethics, and sociology of sleep
Foundational Works: Simon Williams' Sleep and Society (2005) and The Politics of Sleep (2011); Matthew Wolf-Meyer's The Slumbering Masses (2012)
Primary Focus: Assessment of sleep's growing significance as object of social scientific study and its place in contemporary society
Institutional Home: Somatosphere collaborative website; emerging subfield within humanities and social sciences
Evidence Grade: Preliminary—emerging field with growing scholarly attention over past decade
Key Observation: Sleep has transitioned from peripheral concern to significant interdisciplinary research domain spanning medicine, social sciences, and cultural studies

Somatosphere is a fabulous collaborative website covering the intersections of medical anthropology, science and technology studies, cultural psychiatry, psychology and bioethics.

Over the last week they have published a series of posts on “The Longing for Sleep” introduced as follows:

Sleep has been in the news for the past decade or so as a matter of growing concern. Along with this popular, medical and scientific attention, social scientists have been increasingly interested in sleep as an object or process of study. The first major sociological book published on sleep was Simon Williams’ Sleep and Society (Routledge, 2005), after which a number of other monographs and edited collections followed, including Williams’ latest book on The Politics of Sleep (Palgrave, 2011). In 2012, Matthew Wolf-Meyer published the first anthropological study of sleep in the United States, The Slumbering Masses (University of Minnesota Press, 2012). In the conversation that follows Williams and Wolf-Meyer assess the field of social studies of sleep, discuss their commonalities and differences, and think about the future of sleep and its place in the social sciences and humanities.

The conversation is appearing in three posts for the purpose of comments and responses. (Read Part 1 and Part 2). The entire interview is also available here as a pdf.

Read more here. And have a restful weekend.

Filed Under: Thought Piece

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy