• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

Global Healthcare Professionals in Medical Anthropology (CfP, University of Sussex, 9-11 September 2015)

posted on January 9, 2025

Conference Call for Papers Summary: Global Healthcare Professionals in Medical Anthropology

Event Type: Academic conference panel and call for papers
Conference: MAGic 2015 (EASA & RAI), University of Sussex, UK
Dates: 9-11 September 2015
Submission Deadline: 27 April 2015
Core Focus: Intersection of clinical practice and anthropological research in global health contexts
Target Participants: Anthropologists, healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses, pharmacists, physiotherapists), and students
Key Inquiry: How physician-anthropologists balance stakeholder status, theoretical approaches, and research methodologies while maintaining ethical integrity and patient-centered outcomes
Primary Themes: Bias in research formulation, ethical considerations, best practices, and evidence-based interventions optimizing patient outcomes
Abstract Requirements: Short abstract (fewer than 300 characters) and long abstract (fewer than 250 words)

‘Global Healthcare Professionals in Medical Anthropology: issues of theory, methods and practice’
Call for papers closes on 27th April 2015

MAGic 2015 conference – (EASA) & RAI at the University of Sussex, UK, 9-11th September 2015

This panel explores the role of practicing healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses, pharmacists, physiotherapists and other allied professionals) involved in anthropological research in global health. We invite papers from anthropologists, healthcare professionals and students who have observed/experienced first-hand the theoretical, methodological and practical issues involved when combining clinical practice with anthropological research. We particularly invite papers highlighting examples of best practice and lessons learned from the field.

Panel abstract:

Healthcare professionals are often key stakeholders at the intersections of Global Health and Medical Anthropology, but discussion around what this means for the disciplines and practitioners involved remains limited. This panel, convened by junior doctors and medical students, seeks to explore the impact of this work and to interrogate what this might mean for both disciplines, their practitioners and, crucially, for their patients and research subjects. The role of ‘physician-anthropologist’, spearheaded by Paul Farmer, Vinh-Kim Nguyen and other high-profile individuals, is inspiring a new generation of healthcare professionals to combine clinical work with anthropologically-grounded research and practice. How does their depth of understanding and experience as well as their stakeholder status impact upon their theoretical approaches and chosen research methodologies? Do healthcare professionals have a bias when formulating objectives, interpreting data and developing practical applications from their research? What are the ethical issues raised? Anthropological research is gaining increasing appreciation and credibility as it aids the design, implementation and evaluation of Global Health interventions. Consequently, healthcare professionals are increasingly involved in Medical Anthropology as participants. How can their engagement with research be better understood? How can resultant evidence-based interventions requiring collaboration with healthcare professionals be optimised to maximise positive outcomes for patients? This panel invites papers that explore the questions above, stimulate considerable discussion and further the discourse in this field. We particularly welcome papers that showcase best practice and lessons learned, specifically with a focus on applied research that has impacted patients and participants.​

Please submit paper abstracts by clicking the ‘Propose paper’ link at the bottom of this page online:

Submission should include:

  • a paper title
  • authors/co-authors
  • a short abstract of fewer than 300 characters
  • a long abstract of fewer than 250 words

Related Articles

  • Nootropic Supplement Safety Guide 2026: Who Should Be Cautio…
  • Nootropic Ingredients Research 2026: What Studies Actually S…
  • How Cognitive Function Changes With Age: 2026 Overview
  • Empathy and memory in theology and literature! (Affiliates’…

Filed Under: Uncategorized

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy