• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

Free Extract! – Louise Foxcroft, Calories and Corsets: A History of Dieting Over 2000 Years

posted on February 26, 2025

Research Summary: Calories and Corsets: A History of Dieting Over 2000 Years

Category: Historical scholarship on dietary practices and medical philosophy
Historical Period Covered: 2000+ years, with emphasis on ancient Greek and Roman medical foundations
Key Historical Figures: Hippocrates (c. 460–370 BC), Greek and Roman physicians
Core Concept Evolution: Etymology of “diet” from Greek diaita—originally a holistic way of life encompassing mental and physical health, not merely weight loss
Foundational Principles: Balance of alimentation and exercise; the four humours (black bile, yellow bile, blood, phlegm) as markers of health equilibrium
Primary Mechanism of Health: Food intake and physical exertion must be reciprocally balanced to maintain metabolic homeostasis and prevent disease
Historical Evidence Grade: Foundational—ancient medical theories supported by selective modern validation (e.g., obesity and fertility, cardiac risk)
Publication Details: Louise Foxcroft, Profile Books, 2012

Those nice folk at Profile Books have allowed us to reproduce the first chapter of Louise Foxcroft‘s fantastic book on the history of dieting, published earlier this year. Calories and Corsets: A History of Dieting Over 2000 Years (Profile, 2012) gives a whirlwind overview of how the practice of dieting has changed over time.

Foxcroft writes:

The Greek word diaita, from which our word ‘diet’ derives, described a whole way of life rather than referring to a narrow, weight-loss regimen. It provided an all-round mental and physical way to health, basic to one’s very existence and success. Greek and Roman physicians knew that how the body functioned was largely dependent on what an individual ate, and that different foods could affect people in different ways. The whole foundation of Western medical science relied on diatetica, the fundamental healing therapy of a regimen of certain foods. Being too fat, or too thin, was therefore seen as a sure sign of an unhealthy body, an imbalance of its essential ‘humours’ (of which there were four: black bile, yellow bile, blood and phlegm). Fat women, for example, were said to find it difficult to conceive, and recent medical studies have confirmed this. Fat men were believed more likely to die earlier, and modern cardiological science has again shown this to be true.

The Greek philosopher and physician Hippocrates (c.460– 370 BC) relied on experience and philosophy to discern the truth about human frailties and was as uncompromising about our bodies as he was rational about his prescriptions. His Corpus Hippocraticum recommends the observation of nature and the study of evidence in the search for causes of disease. There were two main areas to study: alimentation (the nourishment of life) and the environment we inhabit. Hippocrates understood that the underlying principles of health were food and exercise, or work, and that a high food intake meant that a lot of hard work was needed for it to be properly assimilated. A failure to balance an excess of either would upset the body’s metabolism and disease would surely follow. ‘Man,’ he wrote, ‘cannot live healthily on food without a certain amount of exercise.’ Walking was considered a natural exercise and, even though it ‘partakes somewhat of the violent kind’, if you did it after eating it would prevent the accumulation of abdominal fat, especially if you walked extra fast. More ‘violent’ exercise, including running long distances and gradually increasing your exertions, helped to burn off excess food in the body and was thought ‘suitable for people who eat too much’, along with the ‘induction of vomiting’ which he considered especially beneficial.

Click this link to download, ‘The Origins of the Diet’, Chapter 1 of Calories and Corsets.

Filed Under: Thought Piece

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy