• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

Experiencing Metaphor: A Medieval Headache

posted on January 23, 2025

Research Summary: Medieval Medical Metaphor in Pain Assessment

Topic: Historical analysis of metaphorical language in medieval medicine, specifically pain scale development
Primary Subject: Pietro d'Abano's pain grading scale (late 13th-early 14th century, University of Padua)
Key Metaphors Analyzed: “Stabbing” (pungitivus), “piercing” (perforativus), “crushing” (contritivus)
Central Argument: Metaphors in medieval medicine, while initially developed with patient input, may have distanced physicians and patients from actual symptom experience once systematized
Historical Context: Influenced by classical authorities including Hippocrates, Galen, Avicenna, Aristotle, and Plato through John of Salisbury
Critical Limitation Identified: The formalized scale lacked latitude for symptoms outside its defined terms (e.g., burning pain), forcing approximation rather than precise description
Evidence Grade: Preliminary—historical humanities scholarship examining medieval medical practice through textual analysis
Author & Publication: Jamie McKinstry, Durham University; published in Hektoen International, Volume 6.1 (open access)

Experiencing Metaphor: A Medieval Headache by Jamie McKinstry, Durham University, was first published in Volume 6.1 of the open access medical humanities journal Hektoen International.

“Metaphors have been used extensively in medicine to describe patients, illustrate diseases, and educate students.1 By comparing unlike things that have something in common, they enhance communication in education, science, and clinical medicine.2 Not restricted to the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, their use dates back to areas such as rhetoric and the “age of medical humanism.”3 Yet their didactic and emotive effectiveness can also be identified in the Middle Ages, particularly in the writings of John of Salisbury (c.1120-c.1180), who was influenced by earlier philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, Hippocrates, Galen and Avicenna.4 The use of metaphor in teaching and explaining medicine and its challenges has therefore a well-established history.

A metaphor is effective when it establishes a credible connection with the person for whom it was created. Such connection was often notably absent in the Middle Ages, when the role of the individual patients was often minimized, despite their obvious importance in the development of a diagnostic medical theory. A case in point is the scale of pain developed by Pietro d’Abano at the University of Padua in the late thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries.5 This presumably was developed with the aid of patients, with the purpose of forming an accurate guide to the severity and quality of the pain suffered so that a diagnosis could be made, followed by treatment. Pain was graded in a manner equivalent to the modern ranges of “zero to ten”, and the metaphors chosen ranged from “stabbing” (pungitivus) to “piercing” (perforativus) and the dramatic “crushing” (contritivus). But as Fernando Salmón has observed, once the theory was developed, the voices of subsequent patients seem to fade.6 The scale, a product of medicine’s negotiation with the academia at Padua, offered no latitude for including symptoms absent from it (there is no term for a burning pain, for example), requiring instead choosing the most appropriate word or metaphor from the scale despite it being only approximate. Can it be, therefore, that metaphor could also distance both physicians and patients from symptoms in the Middle Ages?”

Continue reading here…

Filed Under: Uncategorized

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy