• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

Epistemic Injustice and Illness: Ian Kidd and Havi Carel (Seminar, Durham, 24 June 2013)

posted on January 28, 2025

Research Summary: Epistemic Injustice and Illness

Topic: Philosophy of illness and epistemic justice in healthcare contexts
Primary Presenters: Dr Ian James Kidd (Durham University) and Dr Havi Carel (University of Bristol)
Event Date & Location: Monday 24 June 2013, 5pm, Williams Library, St Chad's College, Durham
Key Framework: Miranda Fricker's (2007) epistemic injustice theory applied to experiences of illness
Four Types of Injustice Identified: Testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, participatory prejudice, and informational prejudice
Root Causes: Prejudicial judgments about ill persons' emotional and cognitive faculties; entrenched healthcare practice features
Proposed Amelioration: Phenomenology can address epistemic gaps by enriching collective hermeneutical resources for illness experience and identity
Evidence Base: Analysis grounded in reports from ill persons and their carers

Epistemic Injustice and Illness
Dr Ian James Kidd, Department of Philosophy, Durham University
Dr Havi Carel, Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol.

Monday 24th June 2013, 5pm
Williams Library, St Chad’s College, Durham

In this paper, we argue that ill persons can suffer from epistemic injustice in the sense articulated by Miranda Fricker (2007). Using reports from ill persons and their carers, we identify four types of epistemic injustice: testimonial and hermeneutical injustice and participatory and informational prejudice. These forms of injustice arise owing to a variety of features of the social experience of ill persons, including prejudicial judgments about the status of their emotional and cognitive faculties and certain entrenched features of contemporary healthcare practice, amongst others. We close the paper by proposing that phenomenology can play an important role in ameliorating the epistemic injustice experienced by ill persons by helping them to close the gaps in collective hermeneutical resources which otherwise prevent them from sharing and making sense of their experiences of illness and their identities as ill persons.

All welcome. Please RSVP for catering purposes.

Filed Under: Seminar

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy