• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

ePatients: The Medical, Ethical and Legal Repercussions of Blogging and Micro-Blogging Experiences of Illness and Disease (CfP, Conference, Belfast, 11-12 September 2015)

posted on January 17, 2025

Research Summary: ePatients and Online Health Narratives

Topic: Medical, ethical, and legal implications of patient-generated online health narratives
Conference Details: Queen's University Belfast, 11-12 September 2015, hosted by Health Humanities Project Research Group
Key Research Questions: Power dynamics in healthcare transformation via social media; utility and limitations of patient narratives for medical practice; ethical boundaries of public documentation of terminal illness; legal consequences of clinical experience disclosure
Disciplinary Focus: Interdisciplinary analysis encompassing medical humanities, bioethics, law, and digital culture studies
Call for Papers Deadline: Friday 3 April 2015; 250-word proposals for 20-minute papers submitted to Dr Steven Wilson
Contextual Impetus: Ongoing controversies surrounding patient autonomy in digital space, exemplified by Bill Keller and Emma Keller's 2014 critique of Lisa Bonchek Adams's cancer-related social media engagement
Evidence Base: Grounded in BMJ's 2004 recognition of patient-initiated online resources as a significant medical-cultural transformation

ePatients: The Medical, Ethical and Legal Repercussions of Blogging and Micro-Blogging Experiences of Illness and Disease
Queen’s University Belfast, 11-12 September 2015

Call for Papers: Referring to the growth of online patient-initiated resources, including medical blogs, the BMJ noted in a 2004 editorial that we were witnessing ‘the most important technocultural medical revolution of the past century’. Ten years later, the controversy caused by Bill Keller’s opinion piece in the New York Times (‘Heroic Measures’, January 2014) and a blogpost on the Guardian US website criticising Lisa Bonchek Adams’s decision to tweet her experience of breast cancer, remind us of the ongoing sensitivities surrounding online patient narratives and the complex relationship between the world of medicine and social media. Emma Keller, the freelance journalist (and wife of Bill Keller) who questioned Adams’s use of twitter to discuss terminal illness, wrote the following: ‘Should there be boundaries in this kind of experience? Is there such a thing as TMI? Are her tweets a grim equivalent of deathbed selfies? Why am I so obsessed?’ Adams, in emails to the Guardian, said that the column was ‘callous’ in its treatment of her and noted that the blogpost was riddled with inaccuracies and quoted a private direct message without permission.

As debates on the ethics, dynamics and even legal repercussions of online patient narratives become more prevalent, an international, interdisciplinary conference at Queen’s University Belfast, hosted by the Health Humanities Project Research Group at the Institute for Collaborative Research in the Humanities, will focus on how those with life-threatening or incurable illness use social media, as well as the medical, ethical and potential legal consequences of online accounts of pain, suffering and the clinical experience. We welcome paper proposals dealing with ePatient accounts from a variety of countries and cultures which address the following questions:

  • What does the rise in social media (“web 2.0”) participation by patients tell us about the ways in which the growing influence of e-patients is challenging the power structures of traditional healthcare and, as a result, proving contentious?
  • In what ways might social media narratives of illness be seen as a useful source of information for medics? What, conversely, are their limitations?
  • How do patients influence their online followers, and vice-versa?
  • What are the ethical issues involved in documenting ‘the public deathbed’?
  • What are the potential legal consequences of publicly chronicling the clinical experience?

250-word proposals for 20-minute papers (or three-paper panels), in English, should be sent to Dr Steven Wilson by email attachment. The deadline for receipt of proposals is Friday 3 April 2015.

Website: https://epatientsconference.wordpress.com/

Filed Under: Uncategorized

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy