• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

Enthralling Interdisciplinarity at the Inaugural Congress of the NNMHR (blog post by Diana Beljaars, Cardiff University)

posted on March 23, 2025

Conference Summary: NNMHR Inaugural Congress

Event Type: Inaugural interdisciplinary academic conference in medical humanities and health research
Host Institution: Centre for Medical Humanities, Durham University (Van Mildert College)
Key Disciplines Represented: Human geography, medical humanities, health geography, disability studies, medical sciences, art practice, critical theory, cognitive sciences
Author Background: Diana Beljaars, PhD Researcher at Cardiff University studying Tourette syndrome at intersection of geography and clinical sciences
Notable Features: Open Space sessions, Marketplace research exhibitions, Provocations panel enabling short-form idea sharing
Scholarly Value: Strong—fostered accessible interdisciplinary dialogue and enabled early-career researchers to develop intellectual voice beyond disciplinary boundaries
Primary Impact: Facilitated cross-disciplinary conversation on social and biological models of illness, expanding research perspectives across humanities and sciences
Distinctive Qualities: Inclusive networking environment, extended evening discussions, safe space for articulating concerns beyond traditional disciplinary conferences

Diana Beljaars is PhD Researcher at the School of Geography and Planning at Cardiff University, and her project situates on the intersection of human geography, medical humanities, health and disability geography, and the medical and clinical sciences of Tourette syndrome.

Arriving in a beautiful late summer Durham, I made my way to Van Mildert College passing through its stunning historic centre and sun-kissed parks. Its quiet grandeur would come to set the tone for the conference, as it would turn out to be one of the most interesting and inspiring ones I’ve attended to date.

Its interdisciplinary character was one of its greatest appeals, but as an early career human geographer being relatively new to the medical humanities, I wasn’t quite sure how to contribute. Nonetheless, from the start it became clear that the debates were very open and accessible, and taking part came very naturally. Indeed, the ease with which people from different disciplinary backgrounds engaged in stimulating discussions was apparent at every stage of the varied programme. In particular the Open Space sessions, self-organised and attended by people with an interest in a similar topic, worked very well for me. The session on social and biological models of illness was enthralling, and I found myself working through what was said many days after.

One highlight was the ‘Market place’, during which research projects were exhibited by the people involved. It was a great set-up for easily starting conversations, and it helped me a lot in overcoming any nerves associated with networking. It gave me the opportunity to meet people who are part of fascinating projects, finding shared passions, and having brilliant conversations!

Another absolute favourite was the provocations panel. This session offered opportunities to get your ideas out there in a short and snappy way. I had fully embraced the invitation to be provocative, which challenged me to push the message just that much further. Humbled by the work of my fellow panellists, I learned a lot about art practice involving DNA, new materialism and abortion, academic working conditions, and critical theory and cognitive sciences. The discussions afterward were very enjoyable, and they extended deep into the evening.

The conference was truly one of a kind, and it helped me develop my voice beyond human geography in such a profound way. I’ve met some amazingly interesting people beyond my immediate disciplinary scope, and I will certainly keep following their work closely. I particularly appreciated the freedom to share and discuss concerns that wouldn’t be articulated to such extents in disciplinary conferences.

I’d like to extend my gratitude to the conference organisers for doing such a great job, the Centre for Medical Humanities for hosting it, and the NNMHR for granting me a bursary. I’m looking forward to next year’s edition, but hope to continue conversations before then!

Related Articles

  • Industriousness and Daydreaming: Cognitive Neuroscience’s Re…
  • Neural Initiatives: Neuropolitics, technoscience, and the dy…
  • Nootropic Supplement Safety Guide 2026: Who Should Be Cautio…
  • Nootropic Ingredients Research 2026: What Studies Actually S…

Filed Under: Conference Review, Thought Piece

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy