• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

“Disability and Blood: Blood and the Crips” (CfP, Special Issue of Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies)

posted on January 15, 2025

Research Summary: Special Issue Call for Papers

Topic: Disability and Blood: Cultural, Literary, and Medical Constructions
Publication: Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies (JLCDS)
Guest Editors: Michael Davidson (UCSD) and Sören Fröhlich (UCSD)
Primary Focus: Examines how blood functions in disability construction across cultural, medical, and literary contexts, addressing the gap between disability studies and blood scholarship post-HIV/AIDS.
Key Thematic Areas: Race and disability, eugenics, gendered disability, medical discourses, contagion and immunity, purity and pollution, religious contexts, and representations of bleeding.
Submission Deadline: June 1, 2014 (one-page proposal to Sören Fröhlich)
Selection Notification: August 1, 2014
Full Draft Due: February 1, 2015
Scholarly Framework: Integrates statistical, economic, and medical analyses with cultural and literary criticism to theorize how blood simultaneously defines and defies disability categories.

Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies – Call for Papers
Special Issue: “Disability and Blood: Blood and the Crips”
Guest Editors: Michael Davidson (UCSD) and Sören Fröhlich (UCSD)

Since the HIV/AIDS blood feuds of the 1990s, scholarship into social and cultural definitions of blood has provided much-needed insights into statistical (Tukufu Zuberi), economical (Catherine Waldby and Robert Mitchell), and medical constructions of what blood was, is and how it can function (Keith Wailoo). This special issue of the Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies (JLCDS) aims to close a gap in considerations of disability and blood. What does blood mean in cultural constructions of disability? How are disability and the body’s fluid tissue related in literary and cultural productions? Blood seems omnipresent in cultural representations, ranging from mass-murderers and pure-blooded wizards, vampires, and the undead, to ritual uncleanness, illegitimate Presidential offspring, and pre-natal diagnostics. Be it in the blood work chart and diagnostics, in statistics of pathology, or in other definitions of individuals through blood, ‘abnormalities’ in the blood constitute disability just as disability qualifies blood itself. Yet blood always transgresses boundaries and destabilizes categories; it simultaneously defines and defies constructions of disabled and disability. We invite submissions from scholars who consider how blood functions in the construction of disability. Is it stable or fluid, definable or contagious, visible or hidden? How does blood make the crip, and how does the crip change the blood? How is either or are both abjected from the ‘normal’ to create what Lennard J. Davis calls a “diverse sameness?”

Possible topics include (but are not limited to):

  • The female body as disabled, menarche, menstruation, birth
  • Race as disability, disability as race, the “one-drop rule,”
  • Scientific racism, racial historiography and disability
  • Eugenics in cultural productions
  • Gendered disability, gendered blood
  • Medical discourses
  • Blood in treatments, procedures, and as medical commodity
  • Contagion and infection, conversely, immunization and vaccination
  • Purity and pollution as disabling discourses
  • Disability and blood in religious discourses
  • Containment and rupture as definitions of disability
  • Pathology and normalization of blood
  • Migration, exile, asylum and definitions of blood
  • Indigeneity, inheritance, lineage and disabilities
  • Representations of bleeding and blood.

Please email a one-page proposal to Sören Fröhlich by June 1, 2014. Contributors can expect to be selected and notified by August 1, 2014. (Full drafts of the selected articles will be due on February 1, 2015). Please direct any questions to Sören Fröhlich.

Related Articles

  • Nootropic Supplement Safety Guide 2026: Who Should Be Cautio…
  • Nootropic Ingredients Research 2026: What Studies Actually S…
  • How Cognitive Function Changes With Age: 2026 Overview
  • JellyLean

Filed Under: Uncategorized

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy