• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

Dis-ease, Bad News, Pain, Weeping and Work: Volume 32.3 of the Journal of Medical Humanities out now

posted on March 17, 2025

Research Summary: Journal of Medical Humanities Volume 32.3

Category: Peer-reviewed academic journal; medical humanities scholarship
Key Articles: Disease ontology and medicalization; clinical communication of bad news; pain metaphors; music-inspired therapeutic weeping; poetry and medical practice
Primary Focus: Explores pharmaceutical medicalization of discomfort and clinician resistance strategies, using sinus headache as counter-case study with Foucauldian analysis
Theoretical Framework: Extends Foucault's principles of rarefaction to examine disease legitimization discourse and institutional resistance mechanisms
Clinical Applications: Addresses terminal patient care, therapeutic communication practices, and integrative humanities approaches to suffering
Evidence Grade: Qualitative humanities scholarship; theoretical and critical examination rather than empirical intervention studies
Scholarly Approach: Interdisciplinary integration of medical philosophy, clinical ethics, literary studies, and patient-centered humanities inquiry

Volume 32.3 of the Journal of Medical Humanities is now available.

Dis-ease or Disease? Ontological Rarefaction in the Medical-Industrial Complex, S. Scott Graham:

Recent scholarship in medical humanities has expressed strong concern over the ability of pharmaceuticals companies to medicalize discomfort and subsequently invent diseases. In this article, I explore the clinical debates over the ontology of the sinus headache as a possible counter-case. Extending Foucault’s concept of principles or rarefaction, this paper documents the efforts of clinicians to resist the pharmaceutically-provided understanding of the sinus headache. In so doing, it offers institutions of rarefaction and rarefactive assemblages as useful heuristics for the exploration of disease legitimization discourse.

Hearing Bad News, Janice Morse

Pain and its Metaphors: A Dialogical Approach, Stephen Loftus

How Music-Inspired Weeping Can Help Terminally Ill Patients, Kay Norton

For There is Work to be Done: Poetry and Commentary, Jonathan Reisman, Stacy Nigliazzo, Sarah Buckley, Ryan Childers & Audrey Shafer

Related Articles

  • Nootropic Supplement Safety Guide 2026: Who Should Be Cautio…
  • Nootropic Ingredients Research 2026: What Studies Actually S…
  • How Cognitive Function Changes With Age: 2026 Overview
  • Empathy and memory in theology and literature! (Affiliates’…

Filed Under: Announcements, Publications

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy