• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

CFP – Thinking Feeling: Critical Theory, Culture, Feeling – University of Sussex May 2012

posted on February 11, 2025

Conference Call for Papers: Thinking Feeling

Event Type: Academic Conference
Dates & Location: 18-19 May 2012, University of Sussex
Primary Focus: Critical examination of feeling, emotion, and affect through cultural theory, literary studies, and Marxist traditions
Theoretical Foundations: Hegel, Marx, Freud, Bataille, Williams, Sedgwick; critical theory intersected with contemporary affect theory
Disciplinary Scope: Philosophy, literary studies, visual culture, music theory, art history, sociology, political economy, psychology
Key Topics: Emotion-economics intersection, genealogy of feeling, revolutionary potential of affect, commodification of emotion, political economy and rhetoric of feeling, modern moods (melancholia, anxiety, cynicism, joy)
Submission Requirements: 200-250 word abstracts to Dr Doug Haynes, University of Sussex by 31 December 2011
Central Question: What is at stake politically, aesthetically, and experientially in the contemporary turn toward discourse of feeling, particularly under neoliberal capital?

Thinking Feeling: Critical Theory, Culture, Feeling
18-19 May 2012, University of Sussex

‘Happiness is obsolete: uneconomic’ (Theodor Adorno, Minima Moralia)

As the recent UK riots indicate, there is no escaping the fact that economics provokes, amongst other things, strong feelings. Whether we like it or not, a neoliberal language of economics now pervades and colours our inner ‘private’ emotional lives; the government’s emerging plans to compile a ‘happiness index’ is a clear example of how a rhetoric of ‘feeling’ can be co-opted by capital. More than ever, then, it is important we do not simply accept ‘feeling’ as a spontaneous or natural phenomenon, but instead subject it to genuinely critical scrutiny. Are some feelings static, essential and ahistorical, or can we trace their genealogies? Are feelings entirely subjective and individual, or are they actually objective and social? If they are social, whose feelings are they?

By placing contemporary cultural and literary theory (especially as it deals with ‘affect’) alongside the tradition of Critical Theory, this conference asks what might be at stake politically, aesthetically and even experientially in the recent turn towards a discourse of feeling. With its roots in Hegel, Marx and Freud, Critical Theory has always been concerned with the role of feeling, in all its senses. Meanwhile, literary theorists and practitioners as diverse as Georges Bataille, Raymond Williams and Eve Sedgwick have also focused on relations between culture, society and felt experience.

The conference will therefore set out to utilise these approaches for a critique of modern and contemporary culture. Contributors are encouraged to engage notions of feeling as they relate to particular cultural practices, objects or texts, and are also invited to use recent work on the emotions to rethink aspects of the Marxist theoretical tradition. We welcome proposals from all relevant fields, including philosophy, literary studies, visual culture, music theory, art history, sociology, political economy, psychology, etc.

Possible topics may include but are not limited to the following:

  • The intersection of emotion and economics in contemporary life, literature, film or art
  • The genealogy of feeling
  • Feeling and revolutionary potential
  • The political economy of feeling
  • Rhetoric and feeling
  • The commodification of emotion
  • Culture and ‘modern’ moods (guilt, cynicism, ecstasy, indifference, anxiety, melancholia, depression, shame, boredom, paranoia, rage, paralysis, joy, (un)happiness, etc.)

Abstracts of 200-250 words should be sent to Dr Doug Haynes University of Sussex by 31 December 2011.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy