• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

All Divided Selves, Review of Luke Fowler’s R D Laing Documentary

posted on March 20, 2025

Research Summary: All Divided Selves — Luke Fowler Documentary

Topic: Documentary film examining R.D. Laing's psychiatric philosophy and legacy
Subject Focus: Ronald David Laing's humanist approach to psychiatry, spanning from The Divided Self (1960) to The Politics of Experience (1967)
Key Themes: Institutional psychiatry critique, counter-culture influence, mental health suffering, psychiatric reform and patient dignity
Premiere Date: Thursday evening, Glasgow Film Theatre, UK premiere (sold-out screening)
Critical Perspective: Archival excavation of psychiatry itself through Laing's life and challenging establishment approaches to mental health treatment
Scholarly Value: Multi-layered examination raising enduring questions about consumerism, institutional practices, and personal suffering within psychiatric contexts
Notable Contributors: Director Luke Fowler; post-screening discussion with psychiatrist/historian Allan Beveridge and Adrian Laing (R.D. Laing's eldest son)

Cheryl McGeachan writes: Inside The Glasgow Film Theatre on Thursday evening a diverse mix of individuals crowded together for the sold-out UK premier of Luke Fowler’s new film All Divided Selves. Fowler’s piece, once again, takes Scottish born psychiatrist Ronald David Laing as its centrepiece, and yet this is a film about much more than the man himself. Throughout the carefully threaded together archival footage that wonderfully covers Laing’s journey from a psychiatrist working on publicising his first book, The Divided Self (1960), to the global explosion of his image as a counter-culture figure through The Politics of Experience (1967), this film also manages to become a carefully considered excavation into the heart of psychiatry itself. At times individuals experiencing extreme forms of mental ill-health are painfully stripped bare, revealing the real suffering that is experienced within and beyond the mental institution. However, these glimpses into the psychiatric profession of the past demonstrate the importance of its continued consideration in the present. In part, Fowler’s interest in Laing is due to the humanist approach he adopts and the challenges he poses to an establishment that he felt required internal and external reform. Although the image of Laing has been, arguably deservedly, critiqued his work continues to challenge and inspire those within and beyond the mental health profession, and Fowler’s work is an excellent example of this.

During the discussion session after the screening, chaired by psychiatrist and historian Allan Beveridge, and involving Laing’s eldest son Adrian and Fowler himself, the questions that Laing and his work raises were clearly on display. For Adrian, this film was an emotional journey through a part of his father’s life, where he encountered a number of intimate family friends such as David Cooper and Aaron Esterson, and watched never before seen footage of his father and his world. Beyond the flickering footage Adrian was aware of the stories that exist outside of the films boundaries, and throughout the discussion gave insight into the narratives that feed into the images that were shown.

All Divided Selves is a multi-layered piece that takes the audience on an emotional trip through consumerist society, psychiatry and personal pain, all through the lens of R.D. Laing’s life and work. The questions Fowler skilfully raises will continue to haunt as you leave the screening and for that, and much more, this is a piece that is worth watching time and again.

Related Articles

  • Industriousness and Daydreaming: Cognitive Neuroscience’s Re…
  • Nootropic Supplement Safety Guide 2026: Who Should Be Cautio…
  • Nootropic Ingredients Research 2026: What Studies Actually S…
  • How Cognitive Function Changes With Age: 2026 Overview

Filed Under: Call For Reviews, Thought Piece

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy