• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

Midwifery, Obstretrics and Childbirth Today (CfP, Deadline for Abstracts 7th July 2014)

posted on January 23, 2025

Call for Papers: Midwifery, Obstetrics and Childbirth Today

Category: Academic Collection/Interdisciplinary Research Initiative
Primary Focus: Historical and contemporary perspectives on midwifery, obstetrics, and childbirth from early modern period to present
Submission Deadline: 7th July 2014
Abstract Length Required: 300-350 words
Core Methodology: Integration of humanities and sciences through complexity theory as a bridge discipline
Key Themes: Midwifery education and training, medicalization of birth, decision-making processes, natural birth and bioethics, maternal intuition, fear in childbirth, research dissemination
Approach: Two Cultures debate framework promoting consilience between scientific inquiry and humanistic interpretation of overlooked historical sources
Geographic Scope: European literature across multiple genres from early modern through early twentieth century

Call for Papers:

Abstracts are invited for a collection of essays that will consider the way in which debates, theories and ideas that can be seen in literature, a wide variety of genres across Europe from the early modern period through until the early twentieth century, continues to be relevant or significant to the practice, study, and understanding of midwifery, obstetrics, and childbirth today.

Approach:

Contributors are encouraged to consider the Two Cultures debate, and specifically the movement to integrate the sciences/social sciences and the humanities, which promotes consilience. While many now recognise that the humanities can be shaped and galvanized by scientific enquiry, only very recently have scholars considered that the humanities can also be of benefit to the sciences, and that it too can energise and even advance the disciplines with which it interacts. The humanities has, for instance, the tools to consider scientific progress non-sequentially, via routes that are more indirect, thus offering more flexibility in the acquisition of knowledge; frequently, this involves examining sources which have been overlooked or discarded by the sciences. These alternative perspectives are important in a variety of scientific fields, but particularly in obstetrics and midwifery, the professionals of which must bring together evolving, multi-faceted complexities. The collection will, therefore, seek to combine the range of technologies and methodologies that come from both the humanities and (social) sciences, and provide an holistic approach to the study of obstetrics and midwifery from the early modern period to today.

In particular, it will employ complexity theory, a scientific theory that has been adopted by the social sciences, and increasingly the humanities, each with its own interpretation and approach. As such, complexity theory might offer a useful bridge between the three— a neutral space—that is open and flexible enough to allow for fuzziness, subtleties, imprecise elements and interpretations to be considered, and for meaningful results to be extracted. Crucially, when applied to literature, complexity theory will demonstrate that meaningful interpretations can be extracted from historical texts, and by studying the development of behaviour, practice and attitudes throughout the history of childbirth and midwifery, contributors will identify research gaps, draw conclusions, and highlight simple ideas and principles.

Themes:

Themes might include, but are not limited to: the progress of education and training in midwifery, and the effect of training in a clinical setting as opposed to a homebirth setting; the leadership and authority of midwives; birth medicalization and the evolution of the decision-making process; the relationship between natural birth and bioethics; fear and childbirth; managing the experience or “intuition” of midwives/mothers; the dissemination and reception of research/publications.

Please sent a 300-350 word abstract, indicating what literature/which writers you will examine, as well as a short biography to Francesca Scott by Monday 7th July 2014. Please contact Francesca for further information or clarification.

 

Related Articles

  • Nootropic Supplement Safety Guide 2026: Who Should Be Cautio…
  • Nootropic Ingredients Research 2026: What Studies Actually S…
  • How Cognitive Function Changes With Age: 2026 Overview
  • Empathy and memory in theology and literature! (Affiliates’…

Filed Under: Uncategorized

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy