• Skip to main content

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org

  • Home
  • Telehealth Analysis
  • Research Translations
  • Evidence Reviews
  • Blog
  • About

4th International Philosophy and Medicine Roundtable, November 2-3, Spain

posted on February 15, 2025

Research Summary: 4th International Philosophy of Medicine Roundtable

Event Type: Academic Conference
Location: University of the Basque Country, Donostia – San Sebastian, Spain
Dates: November 2-3, 2011
Primary Topics: Disease definition, clinical evidence, medical epistemology, pharmaceutical ethics, evolutionary medicine
Keynote Speakers: Alfredo Morabia (Columbia University) on Nazism and Public Health; Brian Hurwitz (King's College London) on clinical case construction
Sponsoring Institutions: Faculty of Philosophy and Education Sciences (UPV/EHU) and Department of Logic, History and Philosophy of Science (UNED)
Scope: 24 contributed papers and 2 invited lectures examining philosophical foundations and methodological challenges in medicine and clinical practice

4th INTERNATIONAL PHILOSOPHY OF MEDICINE ROUNDTABLE
University of the Basque Country
Donostia – San Sebastian, Spain

Sponsored by the Faculty of Philosophy and Education Sciences (UPV/EHU), and the Department of Logic, History and Philosophy of Science (UNED)

Registration and more information here.

2011 PROGRAM

Wednesday, November 2

8: 45 Welcome to the Roundtable: Jeremy Simon (Columbia)& the local organizers

9:00-10:30 INVITED SPEAKER: Alfredo Morabia (Columbia University) ‘Nazism and Public Health: Are they compatible?’Chair: Miriam Solomon (Temple University)

COFFEE BREAK

11:00-13:00 CONTRIBUTED PAPERS I Chair: Antonio Casado (UPV/EHU)
Havi Carel (UWE): Illness as a philosophical category; James Krueger (U. Redlands): The Explanatory Nature of Disease; Maël Lemoine (U. Tours): Defining disease beyond conceptual analysis; Lauren Ross (U. Pittsburgh): Value, Dysmenorrhea and the Definition of Disease

LUNCH

14:30-16:00 CONTRIBUTED PAPERS IIChair: Jeremy R. Simon (Columbia)
Jason Robert (Arizona State University): Cultivating clinical wisdom: What? Why? And how?; Kathryn Tabb (U. Pittsburgh): What Good are Natural Kinds for the Philosopher of Medicine?; James Hitt (Saginaw Valley State University): Vegetative State as a Postulate of Medical Knowledge

COFFEE BREAK

16:30-18:00 CONTRIBUTED PAPERS III Chair: Arantza Etxeberria (UPV/EHU)
Barbara Osimani (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore): Risk aversion and the precautionary principle in the pharmaceutical domain: a philosophical enquiry; Sean Valles (Michigan State University): Narrow Evolutionary Biology and Dubious Clinical Medicine in Evolutionary Medicine; Marie Darrason (Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne): Unifying diseases through common genetic mechanisms : the example of the genetic theory of infectious diseases

Thursday, November 3

9:00-10:30 INVITED SPEAKER: Brian Hurwitz (King’s College, London) ‘Construing Clinical Cases – Some Compositional Challenges’. Chair: Fred Gifford (Michigan State University)

COFFEE BREAK

11:00-13:00 CONTRIBUTED PAPERS IV Chair: Kirstin Borgerson (Dalhousie University)
Jeremy Howick (Oxford): Why mechanisms rarely bridge the gap between randomized trials and ‘target’ populations: a reply to Cartwright; Elselijn Kingma (King’s College, London): EBM: mistaking hierarchies of evidentiary tools for evidence; Adam La Caze (U. Queensland): Large randomized trials and therapeutic decisions; Mila Petrova (U. Exeter): (How) Can Philosophical Debates on Variety of Evidence in Medicine Benefit “Health Research Synthesis” Studies?

LUNCH

14:30-16:00 CONTRIBUTED PAPERS V Chair: Jeremy Howick (Oxford)
Kirstin Borgerson (Dalhousie University): Shifting the Burden of Justification in Clinical Trial Design; Daniele Chiffi (University of Padova): In and Out of the Black Box: The ‘Inferential Challenge’ of Weak Associations; Cecilia Nardini (University of Milan): Monitoring in Clinical Trials: the Need to Reform

COFFEE BREAK

16:30-18:00 CONTRIBUTED PAPERS VI Chair: Havi Carel (UWE)
Stéphanie Van Droogenbroeck (Vrije Universiteit Brussel): A preliminary qualitative analysis of the heuristic “Don’t think zebras”; Miriam Solomon (Temple University): “A Troubled Area”:Understanding the controversy over screening mammography for women aged 40-49; Michael Cournoyea (University of Toronto): Untangling Complexity and Pluralism in Medical Explanations

18:00-19:00 GENERAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Chair: David Teira (UNED)

 

Related Articles

  • Nootropic Supplement Safety Guide 2026: Who Should Be Cautio…
  • Nootropic Ingredients Research 2026: What Studies Actually S…
  • How Cognitive Function Changes With Age: 2026 Overview
  • Empathy and memory in theology and literature! (Affiliates’…

Filed Under: Conferences

CentreForMedicalHumanities.org is an independent health evidence publication. This site is not a medical practice, healthcare provider, academic institution, or research organization. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making decisions about supplements, medications, or health interventions. This website is not affiliated with Durham University, the Institute for Medical Humanities, or any academic or medical institution. The domain name reflects previous ownership history and does not indicate institutional affiliation, academic authority, or endorsement. The Durham Institute for Medical Humanities is an active research institute at Durham University — visit their official page for information about their programs and research. Some content on this site contains affiliate links. Purchases made through these links may generate a commission for this publication at no cost to the reader. See our Evidence Standards page for full disclosure details. Content produced by the CMH Evidence Review editorial team. © 2026 CentreForMedicalHumanities.org. All rights reserved. | About | Our Evidence Standards | Non-Affiliation Notice | Privacy Policy